Measuring gaming ad performance: Agree on delivery, audience and evidence before campaign launch; Report ad requests, impressions and viewability separately for accurate exposure tracking; Use controlled experiments to prove incrementality, not just correlation
Image: Gaming Ad Guide

Attribution

Measuring gaming advertising

Plan gaming ad measurement across impressions, viewability, reach, rewarded actions and outcomes, with clear limits for Australian campaign reports.

Measure a gaming campaign against the result it was bought to achieve. Before launch, agree what counts as delivery, which audience and geography the report covers, and what evidence would support the goal. Keep exposure, interaction and outcomes separate: each answers a different question.

Start with a measurement brief

Name the games or apps, devices, placements, creative versions, campaign dates and Australian eligibility rule. List the measures each supplier can provide for each format. A package containing game-world signs and rewarded ads needs separate format reporting; a combined engagement rate would hide how players encountered the message.

Campaign questionEvidence to requestLimit to keep visible
Did the ad run?Counted impressions by format and placementA game session or ad request alone is not delivery
Could it be seen?Viewable, non-viewable and undetermined impressions where the measure appliesViewability is an opportunity to see, not attention
How many distinct recipients were reached?Reach with its counting unit, period and deduplication methodDevices, accounts and people are different units
Did someone act?Defined taps, reward events or destination actionsAn incentive or accidental tap can affect the signal
Did the campaign change an outcome?A suitable comparison or lift studyAn attributed event alone does not establish incrementality

Key Measurement Metrics for Australian Gaming Ad Campaigns

Delivery Proof
Counted impressions by format and placement
Viewability
Viewable, non-viewable, undetermined impressions
Reach Unit
People, devices, accounts, or households (specify method)
Action Signal
Taps, reward events, or destination actions
Incrementality Test
Controlled experiment with comparison group

Keep the event definitions separate

For served intrinsic placements, ask suppliers to report ad requests, impressions and viewability separately, and document their definitions.

For rewarded ads, confirm which events the supplier reports and how each is defined. Reporting may vary by implementation, so do not assume an event available in the app or SDK is included in campaign reporting.

Name the denominator for every rate. A completion rate based on ad starts cannot be compared directly with a visit rate based on impressions. If two reports differ, first align their dates, time zones, format definitions, invalid-traffic treatment and measurement coverage.

Match evidence to the goal

For recognition, establish credible exposure and consider a brand study that compares responses from exposed people with a suitable eligible control group. Check which inventory the study includes and what question it asks. A measured difference in recall or awareness is distinct from a sale.

For an action campaign, define the useful destination event before launch. A visit, install, registration and meaningful product use are different outcomes. Label results as attributed under the stated method unless a sound comparison supports an incremental claim.

Design a comparison around the question

Turn the campaign objective into a hypothesis before launch, then choose metrics and a method that can test it. IAB Australia's guidance on digital ad impact studies emphasises that measures should align with the business objective. The same campaign can have different valid measures depending on what the business is trying to achieve.

Where the question is whether advertising caused an outcome, a controlled experiment can distinguish incrementality from correlation. Plan the comparison before activity begins. It should show what the campaign changed, not just report events that happened after exposure.

Make the test and control groups as comparable as possible. The guidance recommends random assignment, matching groups on relevant characteristics such as demographics and prior exposure, and ensuring each subject is in one group rather than both. Allow for a sample size suited to the precision required: detecting smaller differences requires larger samples.

Use results to guide the next decision

Decide in advance what campaign choices the result could inform. Controlled experiments can assess the effects of targeting, ad context, format and frequency. They provide evidence to optimise current or future campaigns, not a retrospective scorecard.

Keep the question broad enough to reflect how gaming activity sits within the wider campaign. Controlled experiments can examine cross-media effects and the interplay of digital with other media; geographic tests can assess the effect of online activity on in-store sales.

Present findings with the hypothesis, chosen measures, method and result together. This lets decision-makers judge whether the evidence answers the original question. It also avoids treating a result from one format or campaign setting as proof that another will perform the same way.

Read the Australian report on its own terms

State the rule used to classify an opportunity as Australian and whether planning and reporting use the same rule. Show unknown geography separately where available. Label reach as people, households, accounts or devices, and ask whether overlap across games is removed.

Request breakdowns by format and placement, the share that could be measured, and material device or game-version exclusions. Keep an unknown viewability classification unknown. At review, ask what demonstrably ran, what opportunity the intended audience had to encounter it, and what evidence supports the claimed outcome.

In this guide

  1. Measuring viewability in a changing game environmentAssess intrinsic game ad viewability as cameras, surfaces and obstructions change, and read measured and undetermined delivery correctly.
  2. Separating rewarded engagement from purchase intentUnderstand what rewarded ad actions show, then assess stated purchase intent with a suitable survey and comparison group.
  3. Evaluating brand lift in gaming campaignsJudge a gaming brand-lift study by its question, exposed and control groups, inventory coverage, response counts and uncertainty.

More from Attribution

Attribution

Comparing playable engagement with destination conversions

Playable engagement and a destination conversion are different events. One shows someone interacted with the ad; the other shows a later action in the app or store. …